<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida Lawmakers Go Into the Crapper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/</link>
	<description>Rapid Rants from The Hittman</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>I had a health teacher in HS who *very seriously* told the class that it should be front-to-back. He seemed to think this was very important. 
For what it's worth, I can see the value in making sure restaurants have enough TP (imagine eating in a restaurant with no TP and no soap. Not for me, but the cooks). But they already have health inspections, right? You'd think they could just add another list item. Having worked in food service during an inspection, I'm sure the inspector's response would be "I'll be back next week to see if you've cleaned the blood off the walls. Oh, and get some TP."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a health teacher in HS who *very seriously* told the class that it should be front-to-back. He seemed to think this was very important.<br />
For what it&#8217;s worth, I can see the value in making sure restaurants have enough TP (imagine eating in a restaurant with no TP and no soap. Not for me, but the cooks). But they already have health inspections, right? You&#8217;d think they could just add another list item. Having worked in food service during an inspection, I&#8217;m sure the inspector&#8217;s response would be &#8220;I&#8217;ll be back next week to see if you&#8217;ve cleaned the blood off the walls. Oh, and get some TP.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hittman</title>
		<link>http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Hittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Arnie, you are correct.  However, we have to remember that we're dealing with the government here.  First someone will point out the error. Then the DOH (was there ever a more appropriate acronym?) will disagree.  Then they'll commission a sixteen million dollar study to determine the best wiping direction, then a twenty million dollar study to determine if that one is valid.  

Five years later, when the studies are completed, they'll spend six million dollars printing and distributing the new signs, and impose heavy fines on anyone who doesn't replace the old ones with the new ones.  Finally, it will cost a hundred and twenty million to retrain the Wiping Monitors, those with the job of observing people in the stalls to see if they wipe in the correct direction.  (And you think you have a bad job.) They will also receive counseling to help deal with the derision heaped on them by the public in the form of nasty nicknames.  (Ass Pirates, Rectum Wranglers, Anus Inspectors, Posterior Posse, Ducie Detectors, Wipe Witnesses, Dingleberry Detectors, Crap Contemplaters, The Crack Team, Mudbutt Monitors and Shitspys, to name a few.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnie, you are correct.  However, we have to remember that we&#8217;re dealing with the government here.  First someone will point out the error. Then the DOH (was there ever a more appropriate acronym?) will disagree.  Then they&#8217;ll commission a sixteen million dollar study to determine the best wiping direction, then a twenty million dollar study to determine if that one is valid.  </p>
<p>Five years later, when the studies are completed, they&#8217;ll spend six million dollars printing and distributing the new signs, and impose heavy fines on anyone who doesn&#8217;t replace the old ones with the new ones.  Finally, it will cost a hundred and twenty million to retrain the Wiping Monitors, those with the job of observing people in the stalls to see if they wipe in the correct direction.  (And you think you have a bad job.) They will also receive counseling to help deal with the derision heaped on them by the public in the form of nasty nicknames.  (Ass Pirates, Rectum Wranglers, Anus Inspectors, Posterior Posse, Ducie Detectors, Wipe Witnesses, Dingleberry Detectors, Crap Contemplaters, The Crack Team, Mudbutt Monitors and Shitspys, to name a few.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrot</title>
		<link>http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Arnie you heathen!

GET 'IM BOYS!!!

*LYNCH MOB FORMS*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnie you heathen!</p>
<p>GET &#8216;IM BOYS!!!</p>
<p>*LYNCH MOB FORMS*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnie</title>
		<link>http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehitt.com/blog2/2008/03/20/florida-lawmakers-go-into-the-crapper/#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>isn't that backwards? it should be front to back.  that's how I was always taught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t that backwards? it should be front to back.  that&#8217;s how I was always taught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.478 seconds -->
