What, Are They Nuts?
By Dave Hitt on Jan 7, 2008 in Political Correctness
Nope. Not any more.
Sweden’s Army (yes, they have one) had an insignia featuring a lion, viewed from the side. He was obviously a boy lion.  Evidently some of the women didn’t like that, so they demanded he be neutered. (Ain’t that just like a woman.) He was.
Christian Braustein, of the army’s Tradition Commission, said: “We were forced to cut the lion’s willy off with the aid of a computer.”
Remind me, when was the last time Sweden won a war? How likely are they to win another, when they advertise to the world they’re dickless?
Here’s what I like about the Swedes: They know when to fight and when to pretend to play nice. In WWII, instead of getting their assess handed to them like everybody else in Hitler’s line-of-sight, they smiled and played nice until his back was turned, then shuttled Jews (and other “undesireables”) to safety like nobody’s business. This isn’t really relevent to the meat of the article, just a response to the “dickless” comment and the reference to their not winning any recent wars.
Dan Pearson | Jan 15, 2008 | Reply
Pfftt…more freaking PC bullshit from ignorant people. We don’t see people calling for the David’s dick to be chiseled off. I haven’t seen any complaints about the penis sheaths on Breyer horses that are accessible to children.
Alice | Jan 15, 2008 | Reply
But they *are* trying to cover up David’s dick. And Justice’s breast. And any other anatomy that shows up anywhere, including textbooks.
If you haven’t heard complaints about the Breyer horses, you probably just haven’t asked the right people. If there’s anatomically correct art anywhere out there, I guarantee you somebody hates it.
Dan Pearson | Jan 25, 2008 | Reply
BTW, Dave, what’s your take on women in the military?
Dan Pearson | Jan 25, 2008 | Reply
I think it’s fine to have women in the military, as long as they’re not forced to remove their penises.
Dave Hitt | Jan 27, 2008 | Reply