The New York Legislature is considering a bill that would make it a criminal offense for restaurant chefs to add salt to food. Yes, you read that right. Once again, the absurdity of real life makes satire obsolete.
This is exactly what happens when you let the nanny camel get its nose in the tent.
It started, of course, with smoking bans. Nicotine nannies, using concocted “science,” demanded laws that prohibited smoking in any “public” establishment. The results were devastating to many businesses, but they lied about that too. Those of us who believed in property rights and freedom of choice were shouted down and treated like ignorant lepers. Our warnings that this was the first step of an increasingly nanny state were met with derision. “Pfft, that’s just the slippery slope argument.” But slippery slope is exactly how these weasels operate – time and time and time again.
Two years ago The New York City Department of Health asked restaurants that survived the smoking ban to “voluntarily” limit their use of trans-fats. (New York City has their own health department, because New York State’s DOH isn’t nanny enough.) Within a year it was law. Über-nanny Michael Bloomberg hailed it as another victory. Next they forced most restaurants to post nutritional information about all their dishes. So although this proposed state law is so ridiculous we need a new word for ridiculous to describe it, it’s not surprising.
Felix Ortiz, the weasel proposing this legislation, has a history of extreme nannyism. He once tried to legislate mandatory ignition-interlock breathalyzers in all automobiles in NY. Not just those for people with a DUI, but for everybody. Sound goofy? Several car manufactures are now working on making it standard equipment for future models.
It won’t be the first time an oppressive government has tried to interfere with people using salt. This legislation was announced on 80th anniversary of Gandhi’s Salt Satyagraha protesting the British salt tax. It was the start of India’s revolution against the UK. On this side of the pond it would be nice to imagine this could be the final straw, the thing that makes Americans rise up and lash out at any congress weasel that supports nanny legislation, but that’s wishful thinking. Americans used to be made of sterner stuff, but today the majority either doesn’t care about this kind of tyranny or actually likes it.
The bill won’t pass this time, but once the derision dies down it will be back, probably in a more “moderate” form. Nannies are the most persistent dirtbags on the planet. To those who scoff, let me remind you that fifteen years ago the idea of Big Brother arresting you for having a smoke in a bar seemed outrageous.
So, liberals and progressives, still think having Big Brother in control of every aspect of your lives is a good idea?
Edited to add: With each passing day the wonderfully cheesy movie “Demolition Man” becomes more accurate. Check out this clip at the 4:45 mark:




